From the article
“The results of this analysis are encouraging. We find that a transition to efficiency and renewable energy in the power sector is likely to be less expensive than BAU. Table 1 shows the net costs of the Transition Scenario relative to BAU at four points in time. These are annual costs, not cumulative. The net present value of the 40-year stream of savings and costs is a savings of $83 billion, discounted at 4.8%.”



The giant fireball reached from ground-level to about 34,000 feet into the air, violently releasing 3800 times more explosive energy than the Hiroshima bomb– equivalent to fifty million metric tons of TNT. One hundred kilometers from ground zero the heat would have inflicted third degree burns. Atmospheric focusing produced areas of destruction hundreds of kilometers from ground zero, including wooden structures which were completely destroyed, and some shattered windows in Finland. The explosion’s atmospheric shockwave traveled around the Earth three times before it dissipated.
Michail Hengstenberg, Gesche Sager and Philine Gebhardt have written a fascinating article about the world’s nuclear no-go areas for 


